3.6 Overview of discretisation
The choice of numerical method determines how coefficients for and are calculated and consequently the characteristics of the resulting matrix equation .
The finite volume method described here is firmly rooted in the underlying concept of control volumes, described in Sec. 3.1 . It uses integrals over a surface surrounding a volume applied to irregular polyhedral meshes, described in Sec. 3.2 .
The discretisation is described in terms of differential operators, e.g. and , applied to a general field .4
The main concept is that faces within a mesh form closed surfaces surrounding finite volumes, e.g. a single cell. Any surface integral that represents a derivative, e.g. , is approximated by a summation over the faces ‘’ that form the surface, i.e.
|
Intensive and extensive properties
In this chapter, derivatives and their discretisation are described at a point, e.g. , e.g. Eq. (3.8 ):
|
The resulting field is , meaning it is independent of the size of the system/geometry. Like other intensive fields, e.g. and themselves, it can be used in further calculations, e.g. within another derivative or added/subtracted from other fields.
Extensive properties are dependent on the size of the system. For example, the volumetric flux described in Sec. 3.9 is dependent on the face areas . Numerical operations involving extensive properties, e.g. addition, subtraction, or mapping to another location, generally produce meaningless data.
While calculations of derivatives yield intensive fields, matrix equations are constructed in extensive form, with coefficients and source vector scaled by cell volume . In other words, in the discretisation example above, the multiplication by would be omitted.
There is no multiplier in the discretisation of terms which do not involve a surface integral, e.g. time derivative Eq. (3.21 ) and terms in Sec. 3.20 . For those terms, the calculation of matrix coefficients and sources includes a multiplication by .